World News

Entertainment

Followers

LBP AdvancedTech: Navy: We’re 4 Years Away From Laser Guns on Ships: Its a Science Fiction World we Live in ...

Written By Liberty Bell Press Online on Saturday, March 31, 2012 | 9:25 PM

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook    
The dream of sailors, nerds and sailor-nerds everywhere is on the verge of coming true, senior Navy technologists swear. Within four years, they claim they’ll have a working prototype of a laser cannon, ready to place aboard a ship. And they’re just months away from inviting defense contractors to bid on a contract to build it for them.
“Subsonic cruise missiles, aircraft, fast-moving boats, unmanned aerial vehicles” — Mike Deitchman, who oversees future weapons development for the Office of Naval Research, promises Danger Room that the Navy laser cannons just over the horizon will target them all.
Or they will be, if ONR’s plans work out as promised — not exactly a strong suit of proposed laser weapons over the decades. (Note the decided lack of blast at your side.) First step in reaching this raygun reality: Finish up the paperwork. “The contract will probably have options go through four years, but depending on which laser source the vendors pick, we may be able to demo something after two years,” says Roger McGiness, who works on laser tech for Deitchman. “Our hope afterwards is to move to acquisition.”

In "The Pickle" Unexplained Wisconsin: Mysterious Clintonville Booms Caught On Tape

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player



An audio engineer has captured on tape the sound of one of the mysterious booms that have been plaguing Clintonville over the last two weeks, and the noise sounds more like an underground explosion than an earthquake.

The sound was recorded by audio engineer Brian Sullivan.
“The first night, no luck. But, Sullivan said he captured a boom from this past Saturday, one minute before 4 a.m. It’s short, but it sounds like a boom,” reports 790 KABC.
One of the comments that keeps cropping up with regard to the Clintonville bo

SHOCKING VOTER FRAUD EXPOSED!! MUST READ! Romney lawyers rig election in ND: Santorum – Ron Paul cut out

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


 

As the GOP nominating process grinds down to its ultimate end, the Romney campaign has turned savage in its efforts to end the process early. Open conventions and caucuses where people actually get to vote are apparently their worst nightmare.
In some state conventions fake “unity slates” are promoted, with appeals to Santorum and Gingrich delegates to join them in electing delegates that they promise represent the three campaigns proportionately but will shut out Ron Paul. The ”unity slates” are actually all Romney delegates.
In other states “Romney Rules” help make up for the candidate’s unenthusiastic support. In Idaho, for example, where Romney has a Mormon base and won 61% of the vote in a statewide beauty contest, it was nevertheless feared that the candidate would not win a single precinct election in the delegate process. In almost each of the elections, it was feared that Ron Paul supporters would have a plurality.
The solution? A backwards election. It goes like this. The candidate who gets the most votes doesn’t matter, rather the candidate with the fewest is dropped. Voting continues with successive ballots until one is left. If one candidate gets at least 50% of the counties he then gets the whole statewide delegation.

In "The Pickle" Real Strange News:Government Ethicists Argue for Post Birth Abortions.Only Thing Required To Have Liberty Is Life.

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


Ethicists Argue for Post Birth Abortions

Monday, February 27, 2012 8:37 AM Comments (111)
In the Journal of Medical Ethics, two ethicists argue plainly for the killing of babies post birth. They’re not hedging their bets. They’re saying it plain and simple. And I, for one, thank them for it.
Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, associated respectively with Monash University, in Melbourne, Australia, and with the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, in the UK, wrote a piece called “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?”
I could buy the article for $30 and I was close to doing it but then I thought why am I giving these animals my money. I’d essentially be paying these “ethicists” to write more about the right of killing humans.
So, in the “abstract” that’s available for free at the site, it says:
Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.
Here’s the thing - they’re right. If you accept their premises, they’re absolutely right.
The second we allow ourselves to become the arbiters of who is human and who isn’t, this is the calamitous yet inevitable end. Once you say all human life is not sacred, the rest is just drawing random lines in the sand.
An ethicists job is like a magician’s. The main job of both is to distract you from the obvious. The magician uses sleight of hand to pretend to make people disappear. But when ethicists do it, people disappear for real.

LBP News:Before You Vote Wisconsin:Ron Paul and His Faith in Jesus Christ,Evangelical Chuck Baldwin Endorses him and Paul's Pro-Life beliefs.

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


Ron Paul talks Jesus,Faith and Billy Graham.Protestant Evangelical Chuck Baldwin Endorses "Ron Paul". Also you have to ask yourself. Which candidate has the most "Fruits of the Spirit". We can not forget honesty, peacefullness,longsuffering as well. You will see one candidate has them all.Jesus never said. "Leave your flock and go after the wolves" Hoping even they could be spared hell.Are troops lives valued to the GOP as much as babies. See we can not put a price on life.In order to have liberty we must first have life.Shouldnt Pro Life mean just that...Pro-Life.

Milwaukee's Liberty Bell Press News Blog Recieves 2300 Page Reads in First Week! Please Share!


LBP First week as "Milwaukee's Alternative News" we had 2300 pages read!! :D

Thanks and keep sharing.! Freedom is popular!


LBP

LBP NEWS : Ron Paul Media Black Out Wisconsin Exposed! By Bret Hatch. Local AM620 Station Host Admits to MSM Ban of RON PAUL!

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook


If there is one video to watch before you vote in Wisconsin this Tuesday and share with all voting locally this would be the video.This is a powerful eye opening video that brings all views in place by local Bret Hatch.He interviews countless often "Clueless" Political backers who say "he will change America and turn it around" But no one seems to know "How" this will be done. He also interviews a few protesters. Good piece. People of ALL walks of life and political views should see this. Its sad to see so many clueless business people. Are you not curious? Didnt those people most likely get a good education? Expensive colleges I bet.....Local Bret Hatch records local presidential candidate visits and exposes Media Black out.Local citizen Bret Hatch WE REcommend you watch it until the end the last 5 minutes are on the general caucus watch starting at 9:30. This is what is

In "The Pickle" TopSecret:Read the FBI Memo: Agents Can ‘Suspend the Law’

Written By Liberty Bell Press Online on Friday, March 30, 2012 | 3:16 PM

Like Liberty Bell Press On Facebook



 



The FBI once taught its agents that they can “bend or suspend the law” as they wiretap suspects. But the bureau says it didn’t really mean it, and has now removed the document from its counterterrorism training curriculum, calling it an “imprecise” instruction. Which is a good thing, national security attorneys say, because the FBI’s contention that it can twist the law in pursuit of suspected terrorists is just wrong.
“Dismissing this statement as ‘imprecise’ is a rather unsatisfying response given the very precise lines Congress and the courts have repeatedly drawn between what is and is not permissible, even in counterterrorism cases, over the past decade,

See Freedom Is Popular!

Health